![]() ![]() Technically better, if it could be sown.) This seems pretty cheesy, because you are still looking at near 60? flower planters per animal you are letting graze on roses. 045 of rice), and can be grown indoor with just a standard lamp which might be a consideration? I am not actually sure if animals can eat out of flower pots. Roses are a runner up (.033 nutrition/growday, compared to. It takes about 40 actual tiles of grazed rice per cow. If you are going to grow a crop for grazing, it should be rice due to the low grow time. This difference feels kinda stupid.įor comparison - Rice, eaten from the ground, is worth. Quote from: MajorFordson on August 02, 2018, 08:18:11 PMĪs it stands livestock seem to consume grass too quickly to farm reasonably for too little gain foodwise.įor a nice joke - the difference between harvesting a 100% haygrass and letting an animal consume it directly is. Also since b18 there seems to be so many big animal manhunter events, that sometimes I still have plenty of manhunter corpses from the previous event stored, when another one occurs. Now hunting is easily more rewarding, as your riflemen can improve their shooting skills and hunting accidents are very rare, so in last games I've had only muffalos and boomalopes, for caravans and chemfuel, not really for food even though my muffalos are all females because of milk as a bonus. ![]() Just to avoid them I used to have only two hunters, which worked in different shifts, and my colonies had separate pens for chicken & cows - that's how important they were. But hunting seems to be way better in most cases.Ĭattle breeding used to make much more sense earlier, when hunting accidents happened all the time. Why would you want to do this? To get meat for survival rations or pemmican, and fine meals. My strong suspicion is no, but I have admittedly not tried to breed a large herd. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |